ive
THE BHARATIYA SAKSHYA ADHINIYAM, 2023
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023
THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023
User not Logged..
Latest Cases

(61) MOHD. AHSAN Vs. STATE OF HARYANA [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 25-04-2024
Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 302 and 304 – The appeal challenges the High Court's decision to uphold the appellant's conviction for murder, arguing that the conviction under Section 302 can be converted to Part I or Part II of Section 304 of the IPC, which pertains to culpable homicide not amounting to murder - The appellant argued that the incident occurred in a sudden fight without premeditation and there was no intention to cause death, suggesting the offense falls under Section 304 - The res
India Law Library Docid # 1604105

(62) SHRI MALLIKARJUN DEVASTHAN, SHELGI Vs. SUBHASH MALLIKARJUN BIRAJDAR AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 25-04-2024
Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 – The case involves the acceptance of Change Reports for the Vahiwatdar (Administrator) and Trustees of Shri Mallikarjun Devasthan, a Public Trust - The High Court invalidated the acceptance and remanded the matters for reconsideration - The main issue was the delay in filing the Change Report for the new Vahiwatdar of the Trust, which was submitted 17 years after the previous Vahiwatdar's death - The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment, confirming th
India Law Library Docid # 1604106

(63) SHRIRAM MANOHAR BANDE Vs. UKTRANTI MANDAL AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 25-04-2024
Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 – Sections 7, 8 and 9 - Procedure for resignation by employees of private schools – The appellant challenged his termination from, which was set aside by the Tribunal but reinstated by the High Court - The main issues were whether the appellant's resignation was lawfully withdrawn and if the documents related to his resignation were fabricated - The appellant argued that his resignation withdrawal was not consi
India Law Library Docid # 1604107

(64) GLOBAL CREDIT CAPITAL LIMITED AND ANOTHER Vs. SACH MARKETING PVT. LTD. AND ANOTHER [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 25-04-2024
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 5(7) – “financial creditor” - The appeals challenge judgments related to the status of certain creditors of M/s. Mount Shivalik Industries Limited under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) - The primary issue is whether the respondents are financial creditors or operational creditors within the meaning of the IBC - The appellants argue that the respondents are operational creditors, as the agreements indicate services rendered to promote
India Law Library Docid # 1604108

(65) MAYA GOPINATHAN Vs. ANOOP S.B. AND ANOTHER [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-04-2024
Matrimonial Law - The appeal concerns a matrimonial dispute involving misappropriation of gold jewellery and monetary gifts - The appellant, a widow, married the first respondent, a divorcee, and alleged misappropriation of her jewelry and money by the respondents - The core issue is whether the appellant established the misappropriation of her gold jewellery by the respondents and if the High Court erred in its judgment - The appellant claimed that her jewellery was taken under the pretext of s
India Law Library Docid # 1604103

(66) JYOTI DEVI Vs. SUKET HOSPITAL [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-04-2024
Consumer Law – Medical Negligence – Appellant-Jyoti Devi underwent an appendectomy at Suket Hospital, but suffered continuous pain post-surgery - A needle was later found in her abdomen, leading to another surgery for its removal - The case revolves around medical negligence, deficient post-operative care by the hospital, and the determination of just compensation for the claimant-appellant - The claimant-appellant sought enhancement of compensation for the pain, suffering, and financial expense
India Law Library Docid # 1604100

(67) SANJU RAJAN NAYAR Vs. JAYARAJ AND ANOTHER [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-04-2024
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Section 7(a) - Taking undue advantage to influence public servant by corrupt or illegal means or by exercise of personal influence – The appeal challenges the High Court of Karnataka's decision to quash an FIR against respondent for alleged bribery, based on a complaint by the appellant - The main issue is whether the High Court was correct in quashing the FIR, which was based on allegations of bribery and corruption against the respondent - The Supreme Court
India Law Library Docid # 1604101

(68) THAKORE UMEDSING NATHUSING Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-04-2024
The appellants being the original accused Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 5 namely Thakore Laxmansing Halsing (hereinafter being referred to as A1), Thakore Pravinsing Rajsing(hereinafter being referred to as A2), Thakore Umedsing Nathusing (hereinafter being referred to as A3), Thakore Khemsing Halsing(hereinafter being referred to as A5) alongwith original accused No.4, namely, Thakore Prabhatsing Kapursing(hereinafter being referred to as A4), were tried in Sessions Case Nos. 107 and 143 of 1990 respectivel
India Law Library Docid # 1882461

(69) YASH RAJ FILMS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. AFREEN FATIMA ZAIDI AND ANOTHER [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-04-2024
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Section Section 2(1)(g) - Deficiency of Service and unfair trade practice - The case involves a consumer dispute regarding a promotional trailer for a film produced by Yash Raj Films Private Limited - The complainant, a teacher, felt deceived when the song from the trailer was not in the movie and sought damages for mental agony - The court considered whether a promotional trailer creates a contractual obligation or amounts to an unfair trade practice if its cont
India Law Library Docid # 1604097

(70) REHAN AHMED (D) THR. LRS. Vs. AKHTAR UN NISA (D) THR. LRS. [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-04-2024
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) – Section 47 - Questions to be determined by the Court executing decree –Property Dispute - Suit for specific performance - A compromise was reached in 1978, and a decree was passed in 1979 - The main issue is the executability of the 1979 decree, challenged by the respondents claiming it to be a nullity and questioning the jurisdiction - The petitioner, as the decree holder, argues that the decree is executable and that the objections under Section 47 CPC by the
India Law Library Docid # 1604098

(71) JADUNATH SINGH Vs. ARVIND KUMAR AND ANOTHER ETC. [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 19-04-2024
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 302, 149 and 120B – Cancellation of Bail - The complainant's son was allegedly murdered by the accused (along with others) in a property dispute - Five accused were convicted of murder and other charges, with two others acquitted - The High Court granted bail to three accused (‘A’, ‘C’, and ‘R’) considering their long incarceration and bail granted to two co-accused. - The complainant argues against bail, fearing threats from the accused who are "dread
India Law Library Docid # 1604090

(72) RAMAYAN SINGH Vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 19-04-2024
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Section(s) 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506, 427, 394, 411, 302 and 120B - Criminal Law Amendment Act, 2013 - Section 7 – Appeal against Grant of Bail by High Court - The main issue is the appropriateness of the High Court’s decision to grant bail to the accused - The petitioner argues against bail due to the serious nature of the crime, the recovery of the murder weapon, and the influence of the accused over witnesses - The respondents claim they have cooperated with the
India Law Library Docid # 1604092

(73) HANSRAJ Vs. STATE OF M.P. [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 19-04-2024
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Sections 394 read with Section 397 - Voluntarily causing hurt in committing robbery – The appellant was convicted for offences under Sections 394 and 397 of the IPC, sentenced to seven years rigorous imprisonment with a fine, based on the recovery of stolen items and identification by the complainant - The appeal challenges the High Court's dismissal of the appellant's appeal against the trial court's conviction and sentence - The appellant contested the identification o
India Law Library Docid # 1604093

(74) PERNOD RICARD INDIA (P) LTD. Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 19-04-2024
M.P. Excise Act, 1915 - The case involves the applicability of a rule for imposing penalties related to the liquor license period of 2009-10 and whether the old or substituted rule should apply - The main issue is whether the penalty should be based on the rule in place during the violation (2009-10) or the substituted rule from 2011, which reduced the penalty - The appellant argues for the application of the substituted rule, which imposes a lower penalty, as the old rule was repealed - The Sta
India Law Library Docid # 1604094

(75) INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OF INDIA Vs. SATYANARAYAN BANKATLAL MALU AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 19-04-2024
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 236 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) - Sections 190, 193 and 200 – The appeal challenges a High Court judgment regarding a complaint filed by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India against the Ex-Directors of M/s. SBM Paper Mills Pvt. Ltd. for offences under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - The primary issue is whether the Special Court established under Chapter XXVIII of the Companies Act, 2013 has jurisdiction to try offences
India Law Library Docid # 1604095

(76) BABU SAHEBAGOUDA RUDRAGOUDAR AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 19-04-2024
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Sections 143, 147, 148, 506(2) and 302 read with Section 149 – The appellants were convicted for the murder and sentenced to life imprisonment by the High Court, reversing their earlier acquittal by the trial court - The main issue was the reliability of eyewitness testimonies and the admissibility of evidence, such as the FIR and recovery of weapons - The appellants argued that the High Court erred in reversing the acquittal, contending that the eyewitnesses were unreli
India Law Library Docid # 1604096

(77) PARTEEK BANSAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 19-04-2024
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Sections 498A, 406, 384, 420 and 120(B) - The case involves two FIRs filed against the appellant under various sections of the IPC - The first FIR was lodged in Hisar, Haryana, and the second in Udaipur, Rajasthan, with similar allegations by the complainant after two weeks - The primary issue was the legitimacy of the second FIR based on the same set of allegations as the first FIR - The appellant challenged the second FIR, arguing it was an abuse of process and that th
India Law Library Docid # 1604091

(78) DOLY RANI Vs. MANISH KUMAR CHANCHAL [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 19-04-2024
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Section 7 - Ceremonies for a Hindu marriage - The petitioner-wife sought to transfer a divorce petition from Bihar to Jharkhand - The couple, both trained pilots, had a marriage certificate but did not perform Hindu marriage rites - The main issue was whether the marriage was valid under Hindu law, as the couple did not perform the requisite ceremonies - The petitioner argued that there was no valid marriage, and thus the divorce petition should not have been filed -
India Law Library Docid # 1604123

(79) THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND OTHERS Vs. MOHD. ABDUL QASIM (DIED) PER LRS. [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-04-2024
Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 48A and 51A(g) - Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967 - The case involves the State of Telangana and the dispute over forest land, with varying stands taken by the State instrumentality, leading to an affidavit before the Court - The main issue is the challenge against the order favoring respondents, which set aside concurrent judgments by two lower courts on the appreciation of fact and law - The appellants argue against the jurisdiction and basis of the revie
India Law Library Docid # 1604083

(80) KIRPAL SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-04-2024
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) – Sections 302, 304 and 34 – Acquittal – Benefit of Doubt - Appellant, was convicted for murder and attempted murder, with the motive being jealousy over the deceased's successful business - The appeal challenges the High Court's affirmation of the trial court's conviction, questioning the reliability of witnesses and the investigation's integrity - The defence argued contradictions in witness testimonies, questioned the alleged motive, and highlighted the improbability of
India Law Library Docid # 1604084